Tchernichovski, O; Nottebohm, F; Ho, CE; Pesaran, B; Mitra, PP
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, JUN 2000, 1167-1176
Assessment of vocal imitation requires a widely accepted way of describing and measuring any similarities between the song of a tutor and that of its pupil. Quantifying the similarity between two songs, however, can be difficult and fraught with subjective bias. We present a fully automated procedure that measures parametrically the similarity between songs. We tested its performance on a large database of zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata, songs. The procedure uses an analytical framework of modern spectral analysis to characterize the acoustic structure of a song. This analysis provides a superior sound spectrogram that is then reduced to a set of simple acoustic features. Based on these features, the procedure detects similar sections between songs automatically. In addition, the procedure can be used to examine: (1) imitation accuracy across acoustic features; (2) song de development; (3) the effect of brain lesions on specific song features; and (4) variability across different renditions of a song or a call produced by the same individual, across individuals and across populations. By making the procedure available we hope to promote the adoption of a standard, automated method for measuring similarity between songs or calls. (C) 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
Keywords: FINCH TAENIOPYGIA-GUTTATA; ZEBRA; ELEMENTS; SYNTAX
References: CATCHPOLE CK, 1985, BIRD SONG; CLARK CW, 1987, ETHOLOGY, V76, P101; CYNX J, 1990, J COMP PSYCHOL, V104, P3; ESSER KH, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P14019; FEE MS, 1998, NATURE, V395, P67; HO CE, 1998, P JOINT S NEUR COMP, V5, P76; JARVIS ED, 1998, NEURON, V21, P775; KANWAL JS, 1994, J ACOUST SOC AM, V96, P1229; KOGAN JA, 1998, J ACOUST SOC AM, V103, P2185; KONISHI M, 1965, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V22, P770; KROODSMA DE, 1982, ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATI, P11; MARLER P, 1964, SCIENCE, V146, P1483; MORRIS D, 1954, BEHAVIOUR, V6, P271; NELSON DA, 1995, ANIM BEHAV, V50, P83; NOTTEBOHM F, 1968, IBIS, V110, P549; NOTTEBOHM F, 1978, Z TIERPSYCHOL, V46, P298; NOWICKI S, 1990, ETHOLOGY, V86, P89; PERCIVAL DB, 1993, SPECTRAL ANAL PHYSIC; PRICE PH, 1979, J COMP PHYSIOL PSYCH, V93, P260; SCHARFF C, 1991, J NEUROSCI, V11, P2896; SLEPIAN D, 1961, BELL SYST TECH J, V40, P43; TCHERNICHOVSKI O, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P8951; THOMSON DJ, 1982, P IEEE, V70, P1055; THOMSON DJ, 1990, PHILOS T ROY SOC A, V332, P539; THOMSON DJ, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2027, P236; THORPE WH, 1954, NATURE, V173, P465; THORPE WH, 1958, IBIS, V100, P535; WILLIAMS H, 1992, J COMP PSYCHOL, V106, P278; ZANN RE, 1996, ZEBRA FINCH SYNTHESI